In no particular order and certainly overlapping:
- Even if one could maintain the structural integrity and function of the body, does it follow that, over vastly extended periods of life, one would keep one's sanity?
- Just as mathematicians are said to “burn out” in their thirties or their best work is produced while they are still relatively young, would we suffer a similar intellectual fatigue from sustained longevity?
- Would apathy set in - seen it; done it all before (over and over again) – can't be bothered?
- Isn't part of what makes life valuable its fragility? And that fragility informs our moral outlook?
- Would we be in danger of an emotional flattening – from repeat exposure to the tide of experience; for example, “till death do us part” might take on a whole realm of commitment hitherto unimaginable?
- Like the drug addict, would we build up a tolerance of life to the point were more actually becomes less?
- Can one get tired of learning and adapting to the new: can we get tired of the new?
- Instead of broadening our horizons, could it not lead to an entrenchment of ideals and views – a continuous of supplication to “old guard” at the expense of innovation?
One further conjecture that is implicit in the abductee's story is that an extended lifespan would lead to rapid and sustained technological advancement and the mastering of space-time, i.e. not just the power to affect the the future, but the past as well. At what price would these God-like powers come? May be the aliens are not just nicknamed "the greys" for their appearance alone (of course other brands of ET are available). Hypothetically speaking.
No comments:
Post a Comment